Nomads Sports Club History

'Watchlisted' no more

April 10, 2012  |    Share

The constant threat that has been hanging like the proverbial sword of Damocles over the heads of eight No­mad Sports Club board members since August last year is finally gone, and the apparent ’injustice’ wrought by an un­deserved ‘punishment’ hopefully con­signed to oblivion, if not the trash bin.

The Watchlist Order issued against directors Jonathan Thorp, Matthew Freeston, Thomas Whitwell, Al Cervero, Andrew Yates, Iain Sinclair, Keith Warne and Faisal Durrani-Khan was lifted and their names ordered deleted from the Bureau of Immigration’s WLO last De­cember 13 by the Department of Jus­tice’s Chief Legal Counsel Ricardo V. Paras III.

The onerous document, which is is­sued by the DoJ against citizens or resi­dents who have undecided court cases, was applied to the 2008 NSC Board in connection with the criminal complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the Club for alleged violation of the Securities Regu­lation Code.

At the time the WLO was issued, the complaint was pending resolution before the National Prosecution Service of the Justice Department. Last January, however, the DOJ issued a ruling of ‘probable cause’ and recommended the filing of charges against the NSC. (See related story)

During the whole period that the WLO was in effect, the Board members concerned, who serve the Club on a voluntary basis, suffered massive finan­cial losses and untold personal inconve­nience as most of them require foreign travel in the course of their jobs and business interests. They were obligated to obtain an Allow Departure Order each time they traveled out of the country which involved paying the fees, reporting to the Consular Office of the country that they were travelling to and then reporting back to the Department of Justice upon each return.

To speed up the lifting of the WLO, NSC filed a petition with the DoJ on September 26, 2011. However, SEC Supervising Commissioner Huberto B. Gaiteacted with lightning speed to op­pose the request two days after the letter was submitted.
When the WLO’s 60-day period ex­pired on October 22, the Directors found themselves in a trickier situation. Their names remained in the Immigration Bu­reau’s data base, which effectively still barred them from leaving the country and rendered an Allow Departure Order (ADO) ineffectual.

On November 22, the SEC filed an Ur­gent Request for Watch List Order against the Board claiming “there is real danger that the respondents who are mostly for­eign nationals may flee the country to avoid criminal liaibility.”

The Department of Justice denied the request stating that the rationale for the is­suance of a WLO is based on the fact that the respondents are “flight-risks”. It stated that “during the existence of the WLO, Messrs. Thorp, Freeston and Sinclair re­quested the DoJ for the issuance of an Al­low Departure Order (ADO) to travel out­side the country and faithfully complied with all the conditions set forth”.

    

0 Comments

 

Post a Comment

 

Name
Email

Comment

Back to Archive